(imported comment written by mbp911)
Can you explain how to create custom relevance for selecting content?
Example: All Microsoft Critical Patches From Release Date of Dec 2010.
(imported comment written by mbp911)
Can you explain how to create custom relevance for selecting content?
Example: All Microsoft Critical Patches From Release Date of Dec 2010.
(imported comment written by Lee Wei)
mbp911
Can you explain how to create custom relevance for selecting content?
Example: All Microsoft Critical Patches From Release Date of Dec 2010.
This would be the statement that you want to paste into the Custom Relevance text box.
bes fixlets whose (
display name of site of it = âPatches for Windows (English)â and
source severity of it as lowercase = âcriticalâ and
name of it as lowercase does not contain âcorrupt patchâ and
name of it as lowercase does not contain âsupersededâ and
source release date of it >= âWed, 01 Dec 2010â as date
)
Note that I have added the filters for corrupt and superseded patches. Please take them out if you want to see them.
Feel free to post any other content that you need. A few examples are always easier.
Lee Wei
(imported comment written by mbp911)
Can you explain how to create custom relevance for selecting content?
Example: All Microsoft Critical Patches From Release Date of Dec 2010.
(imported comment written by mbp911)
Thanks again for your quick response. This is exactly what I needed.
(imported comment written by Lee Wei)
S.Dave
Iâm also quite confused about the way to create custom relevance for selecting content? Does anyone help me ? thanks in advance
Stephen,
You will have to write a Session Relevance statement that returns one or many Fixlets.
Here is our site location for writing Relevance. This is not trivial, so it will take some time to learn the language. For now, some examples might help.
All Fixlets from the âUpdates for Windows Applicationsâ site that has the name âacrobatâ:
bes fixlets whose (name of site of it = âUpdates for Windows Applicationsâ and fixlet flag of it = true and name of it as lowercase contains âacrobatâ)
All Fixlets starting with âMS11-052â:
bes fixlets whose (name of it starts with âMS11-052â)
If you have something specific, we can help write an example statement for you.
Lee Wei
(imported comment written by JA-CTI91)
This is a fantastic report! Iâm trying to tweak it for a particular use, and was wondering what would be the most straightforward way to modify this report so that the Outstanding Fixlets grid displays a list of the installed fixlets by computer, as opposed to the outstanding fixlets? Is there some obvious way to accomplish this that Iâve been missing? Thank you!
(imported comment written by Lee Wei)
JA-CTI,
I think you are referring to the other report at http://forum.bigfix.com/viewtopic.php?id=4307?
Unfortunately, there is no easy way to switch to Installed Fixlets.
The âBES Fixletâ object comes with an easy property to show all the âApplicable Computersâ. Meaning the computers where the Fixlet is relevant. So the report has been setup to take advantage of that.
The flip side to show all installed Fixlets will probably better serve rewriting rather than repurposing.
Lee Wei
(imported comment written by Gman8291)
Fantastic Report.
Anyone else having issues exporting to Excel?? Ive downloaded firefox 3.6 and whenever try to open the file i get: Problems During Load - Workbook Settings.
Seems to point to an issue with Header length:
XML Spreadsheet Warning in Worksheet Setting
REASON: String too long
ACTION: Truncating string
FILE: P:\filename\filename.xml
GROUP: PageSetup
TAG: Header
ATTRIB: Data
VALUE: very very long long header too long for Excel to handle
If i open with OpenOffice all the text is along the top row and it leaves off many values.
Thanks
Gordon
(imported comment written by Lee Wei)
Hi Gordon,
The export to Excel function actually produces an XML file that Excel knows how to open. This is the reason we get the first error âThe file is in a different format than specified by the file extensionâ. The error is benign in that I specified extension XLS, but it is actually an XML file.
So save the file first, then open it with a text editor to edit the XML element(s) causing the problem.
In your case, search for âvery very long long header too long for Excel to handleâ and change that.
I donât remember a header with this name in the report though.
Lee Wei
(imported comment written by Gman8291)
Hi Lee,
You are correct. Thank you. When i open this with an XML editor I can see all the details of the report. However everything is in one single across line 1. Really Odd. No line about the âReally really long lineâ either, however the report is just one really long lineâŚ
I have attached the report i am trying to export. Unfortunately my XML scripting is not up to much. You wouldnt be able to point me in the right direction of what i need to do to have this formatted as expected?
I would be forever in your Debt!
Gordon
(imported comment written by Lee Wei)
Gordon,
The attachment is missing from the post.
I think this forum has problems with attachments some times.
Please send it to me via private message.
Lee Wei
(imported comment written by Lee Wei)
Opening an Excel export and getting an error during load with âWorkbook Settingâ is a bug in my Excel exporting code.
Until I fix it, here is the workaround.
Open the export which is an XML file.
Search for âss:Worksheet ss:Nameâ and change the value to something short and simple.
I am using the name of the grid as the name of the worksheet, which is often too long for Excel.
Lee Wei
(imported comment written by Lee Wei)
âIs this report compatible with version 8.2.x?â
Yes and no. Yes the report will run, but no, it is not usable because it has become very slow.
Engineering changed Web Reports to reduce memory footprint.
Unfortunately in the process, some needed data is not cached and requires retrieval from the backend database.
Engineering is considering reverting to the old behavior for use cases such as this one.
Lee Wei
(imported comment written by GregSa)
Hello,
Is there any plan to have a new version to this report soon? We were using it and it was very valuable to our company. If not is there another report like it that will work in 8.2.x?
Thanks!
(imported comment written by Lee Wei)
Greg,
I assume you are referring to this report currently running very slow in TEM 8.2.x.
Engineering has confirmed the fix which is due out end of February to middle of March 2012.
The fix will be in the form of a new TEM version 8.2.x greater than the latest 8.2.1093.
Lee Wei
(imported comment written by GregSa)
Yes you assumed correct. So I will now assume with the new TEM version 8.2.x greater than the latest 8.2.1093 all agents and relays will need to to be upgraded?
(imported comment written by Lee Wei)
This would be a server side fix, so the Agents and Relays do not have to be upgraded for this particular problem.
You might want to upgrade the Agents/Relays for other reasons.
The TEM Server will always support Agents/Relays from earlier releases.
Lee Wei
(imported comment written by ChaddC)
I am trying to use this report to get some insight as to the number of relevant MS Security hotfix fixlets. Sounds pretty simple. However I am either confused as to the proper way to do this, or I have found an interesting bug.
I use a following filters.
âcontentâ âsiteâ âisâ âpatches for windowsâ
âcontentâ âcategoryâ âisâ âsecurity hotfixâ
Within the report for the âContentâ selection I select
âAll microsoft critical fixletsâ
âall microsoft important fixletsâ
âall microsfot moderate fixletsâ
âall microsoft low fixletsâ
âall microsoft none fixletsâ
âall microsoft unspecifiex fixletsâ
Compliance for all microsoft fixlets is then reported as a number. This should be all of the currently relevant windows security hotfix fixlets.
My problem is that if I run the same report, but each time I only select one of the fixlet severities within the âContentâ list i.e. âAll microsoft critical fixletsâ and I record each of the totals for all six fixlet criticalities, the totals do not match.
As an example, If I run the report including all 6 criticalities, I may get a total of 580.
However if I run the report 6 times, each time choosing a single fixlet criticality, they total up to 690.
Am I using this report incorectly? Is there a proper way to do it? Is this a known bug?
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
(imported comment written by Lee Wei)
Hi Chadd,
Thanks for asking - actually this showcases a neat feature of this report (sorry if I might say so myselfâŚ), which is its ability to group MS Security Bulletins together.
As an example, the following security bulletin is actually made up for different fixes for different platforms, and there are 19 Fixlets provided.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/security/bulletin/MS12-043
Microsoft Security Bulletin MS12-043 - Critical
Vulnerability in Microsoft XML Core Services Could Allow Remote Code Execution (2722479)
Note that the bulletin is classified as âCriticalâ, even though there are components within the bulletin that are of âModerateâ severity.
Back to the Compliance Report, there is a checkbox for âGroup MS Patchesâ, which will combine the above 19 Fixlets into 1 row. It will show âCriticalâ as the severity, which is the highest severity of the group of Fixlets.
So when we check âGroup MS Patchesâ, many Fixlets of different severity levels are grouped together, causing your total number to be different. If you uncheck âGroup MS Patchesâ, then the numbers will add up correctly.
Lee Wei
(imported comment written by SystemAdmin)
Hi Lee Wei,
May I check with you that if I want to make the following modifications of the current report to better cater to our needs:
Remove Fixlet ID, Category, Release Date, Applicable, Installed and Outstanding
Add Description of Fixlet and Error Message
What are the codes I should insert/remove?
Really appreciate your help and many thanks!
Zhang Meng