Just trying to clean up some of my relevance statements. I’m thinking I want to search for a property value in a tuple/plural of regex. Started it but it always comes back false.
exists (regex "([0-9]{5}-[a-z,0-0]{4}[0-9]{6})";regex "([wx]{1}yz)") whose (value of setting "My Setting" of client as string contains it)
Below is TRUE for me, so the above should be too:
value of setting "My Setting" of client as lowercase = regex "([wx]{1}yz)")
I was hoping to avoid ‘(value of… ) or (value of…) or (value of…)’
You can do this, but not like that. Something like this: (i haven’t tested this at all)
exists (it as lowercase as trimmed string) whose(exists matches (regex "([0-9]{5}-[a-z,0-0]{4}[0-9]{6})";regex "([wx]{1}yz)") of it) of values of settings "My Setting" of client
I find it much easier to read and understand if relevance is written in a way to maintain a left to right flow from more general to more specific.