Inconsistent relevance language results?

(imported topic written by hermann_huebler@at.ibm.com)

I’m new to TEM and observed some inconsistencies in the evaluation of relevance expressions. I have the following two Linux systems registered:

Computer Name OS

lexbz1169 Linux Red Hat Enterprise Server 5.8 (2.6.18-308.4.1.el5)

v525403066c0 Linux Red Hat Enterprise Server 6.0 (2.6.32-71.el6.x86_64)

When creating a test fixlet with the following relevance expression:

name of operating system starts with “Linux” <

then both computers are reported as applicable. This makes sense and is fine for me …

However when I change the relevance expression to:

name of operating system is “Linux” <

then ONLY v525403066c0 is reported as applicable. This inconsistency does not really make sense … I’d expect either both Linux boxes to be relevant or none!

What is the reason why the

name of operating system is “Linux” <

evaluates to be applicable to one computer? Why isn’t the expression relevant to the lexbz1169 computer??

(imported comment written by hermann_huebler@at.ibm.com)

Sorry for the strike thru … for clarification the two expressions are:

name of operating system is “Linux” name of operating system starts with “Linux” <