(name of it, name of issuer of it, time issued of it) of bes actions whose (time issued of it > (now - 1*day))
now is already a time object and can be referenced directly. When all in relevance you don’t need the {}. That is relevance substitution in other areas like in action script.
When I ran the relevance showing all actions that ran last night I got the full list. However, when I ran the version that showed the endpoint, I only got a list of machines from just one action. Not the entire list. Did I miss something?
What has discussed above is the BES Action object.
When computers respond to an Action, we get the BES Action Result object.
BES Action Result objects can be created in the following ways:
action results of : bes action result
result <( bes action, bes computer )>: bes action result
result <( bes computer, bes action )>: bes action result
result from of : bes action result
result from of : bes action result
results of : bes action result
It has the following properties:
action of : bes action
apply count of : integer
computer of : bes computer
detailed status of : string
line number of : integer
retry count of : integer
status of : bes action status
So we can write a statement like the following:
( name of action of it, time issued of action of it, name of computer of it, status of it ) of results from (bes actions) of (bes computer whose (name of it =
"MyComputer"))
I added a few more objects to get the full information of the actions ran:
(
name of action of it,
id of actions of it,
state of actions of it,
time issued of action of it,
status of it,
(if (exists source fixlet of it) then (if (name of site of source fixlet of it = “ActionSite”) then (“Master Action Site”) else (display name of site of source fixlet of it)) else (if (operator site flag of it) then (name of issuer of it & “'s Operator Site”) else (“Master Operator Site”))) of action of it,
(if (exists issuer of actions of it) then (name of issuer of actions of it) else (“None”)),
(if (it) then (“Action Group”) else (“Single Action”)) of multiple flag of actions of it,
name of computer of it) of results from (bes actions) of (bes computer whose (name of it = “MyComputerName”)
Can someone please help me, on how Stagger works in BigFix.
I need to target a 500 MB package to 16000 machines and I want to cover 1000 machines per week, please suggest what should be the stagger time be specified.
“Stagger action start times over” does not provide the precise control you have described.
When you specify the number of minutes (X minutes) in this option, all the computers receiving the Action will randomly picked a time from 0 - X.
The randomness will ensure that the Actions will be distributed across the time span, but we don’t know exactly how many computers are taking actions, except to make a calculated guess.
Hello,
both work for me.
First relevance:
(names of computers of results of it,
name of it,
name of issuer of it,
state of it,
time issued of it
) of bes actions whose (time issued of it > (now - 1*day) )
and Second relevance:
(
name of action of it,
id of actions of it,
state of actions of it,
time issued of action of it,
status of it,
(if (exists source fixlet of it) then (if (name of site of source fixlet of it = “ActionSite”) then (“Master Action Site”) else (display name of site of source fixlet of it)) else (if (operator site flag of it) then (name of issuer of it & “'s Operator Site”) else (“Master Operator Site”))) of action of it,
(if (exists issuer of actions of it) then (name of issuer of actions of it) else (“None”)),
(if (it) then (“Action Group”) else (“Single Action”)) of multiple flag of actions of it,
name of computer of it) of results from (bes actions ) of (bes computer whose (name of it = “my computer”))
Is it possible to change this statement of bes actions whose (time issued of it > (now - 1*day) ) instead of (bes computer whose (name of it = “my computer”)) at the second relevance???