(imported topic written by amagewick91)
What does this part of the report mean? I cannot figure it out.
(imported comment written by BenKus)
It means a computer that was fixed and become relevant again…
Ben
(imported comment written by amagewick91)
I was afraid of that as being the case. I don’t understand why my report looks the way it does then.
Here are my baseline report numbers (1 baseline) for just the beginning few months after its creation. Why is my regressed computer count so high if I had created the baseline in June. Is it because of the random 2005 date in the beginning? How can from day 2 to day 3 can there be 3 more affected and then 28 more regressed? It doesn’t seem as though it should be, but with these numbers it makes this report very hard to understand, can someone please elaborate?
Affected Computers Regressed Computers Date
1 0 6/29/2005
229 796 5/3/2010
232 824 5/4/2010
235 837 5/5/2010
238 841 5/6/2010
239 849 5/7/2010
241 856 5/10/2010
(imported comment written by amagewick91)
This baseline contains all MS10-0xx fixlets that apply to client OS.
(imported comment written by BenKus)
Is there a “pending restart” Fixlet or “corrupt patch” Fixlets in your Baseline?
Ben
(imported comment written by amagewick91)
No there is not.